Harmful tipping points in the natural world pose some of the gravest threats faced by humanity. Their triggering will severely damage our planet’s life-support systems and threaten the stability of our societies.
In the Summary Report:
• Narrative summary
• Global tipping points infographic
• Key messages
• Key Recommendations
Executive summary
• Section 1
• Section 2
• Section 3
• Section 4
This report is for all those concerned with tackling escalating Earth system change and mobilising transformative social change to alter that trajectory, achieve sustainability and promote social justice.
In this section:
• Foreword
• Introduction
• Key Concepts
• Approach
• References
Considers Earth system tipping points. These are reviewed and assessed across the three major domains of the cryosphere, biosphere and circulation of the oceans and atmosphere. We then consider the interactions and potential cascades of Earth system tipping points, followed by an assessment of early warning signals for Earth system tipping points.
Considers tipping point impacts. First we look at the human impacts of Earth system tipping points, then the potential couplings to negative tipping points in human systems. Next we assess the potential for cascading and compounding systemic risk, before considering the potential for early warning of impact tipping points.
Considers how to govern Earth system tipping points and their associated risks. We look at governance of mitigation, prevention and stabilisation then we focus on governance of impacts, including adaptation, vulnerability and loss and damage. Finally, we assess the need for knowledge generation at the science-policy interface.
Focuses on positive tipping points in technology, the economy and society. It provides a framework for understanding and acting on positive tipping points. We highlight illustrative case studies across energy, food and transport and mobility systems, with a focus on demand-side solutions (which have previously received limited attention).
Radicalisation can also exhibit tipping dynamics. Research has described radicalisation – for example, the spread of right-wing ideology (Youngblood, 2020) – through complex contagion processes. Similarly, the spreading of extremist content on social media has been observed to follow contagion processes (Ferrara, 2017). Moreover, processes of ‘cross-pollination’ of radical ideas have been documented (Kimmel, 2018; Baele et al., 2023), including for climate denial (Agius et al., 2020). Cross-pollination describes the merging of previously separate radical clusters, facilitating further contagion by expanding the number of radicalised individuals and their reach to those not yet radicalised.
Polarisation may increase quickly in response to fuelling of political partisanship and may be very difficult to reverse. Macy et al., (2021) found that polarisation is most likely when the issue that is meant to unite a society (e.g. facing the threat of climate change) is not as salient as the political partisanship. Radicalisation is also more likely in affluent societies, who are typically more sheltered from climate impacts but more likely to feel a threat to their status – and recent trends seem to confirm this (Vihma et al., 2021; Dunlap et al., 2016).
In an extreme scenario, radicalisation tipping triggered by escalating Earth system destabilisation or breached Earth system tipping points, could lead to currently fringe political ideologies taking hold. One such example is ecofascism (Taylor, 2019), which reinterprets white supremacy ideology in the context of the climate crisis with the goal to defend habitable areas for the white race. Already, some recent right-wing terrorists have subscribed to and legitimised their actions with ecofascism, such as Brenton Tarrant, who committed a terror attack on a mosque in Christchurch, New Zealand, in 2019, killing 51 people. Finally, if radicalisation escalates we may also enter the pathway of a violent conflict (see Chapter 2.3.5).