Harmful tipping points in the natural world pose some of the gravest threats faced by humanity. Their triggering will severely damage our planet’s life-support systems and threaten the stability of our societies.
In the Summary Report:
• Narrative summary
• Global tipping points infographic
• Key messages
• Key Recommendations
Executive summary
• Section 1
• Section 2
• Section 3
• Section 4
This report is for all those concerned with tackling escalating Earth system change and mobilising transformative social change to alter that trajectory, achieve sustainability and promote social justice.
In this section:
• Foreword
• Introduction
• Key Concepts
• Approach
• References
Considers Earth system tipping points. These are reviewed and assessed across the three major domains of the cryosphere, biosphere and circulation of the oceans and atmosphere. We then consider the interactions and potential cascades of Earth system tipping points, followed by an assessment of early warning signals for Earth system tipping points.
Considers tipping point impacts. First we look at the human impacts of Earth system tipping points, then the potential couplings to negative tipping points in human systems. Next we assess the potential for cascading and compounding systemic risk, before considering the potential for early warning of impact tipping points.
Considers how to govern Earth system tipping points and their associated risks. We look at governance of mitigation, prevention and stabilisation then we focus on governance of impacts, including adaptation, vulnerability and loss and damage. Finally, we assess the need for knowledge generation at the science-policy interface.
Focuses on positive tipping points in technology, the economy and society. It provides a framework for understanding and acting on positive tipping points. We highlight illustrative case studies across energy, food and transport and mobility systems, with a focus on demand-side solutions (which have previously received limited attention).
Public finance plays a pivotal role in stimulating new investment by encouraging private investors to follow suit (Mazzucato, 2013). This is not only due to the substantial amount of funding provided by public actors, such as public investment banks and governmental agencies, but also to the quality of financing schemes they offer. Public financing, with its long-term time horizons, favourable repayment conditions, and support services, resembles the role of financial entrepreneurs (Perez, 2003). By minimising risks associated with investments and supporting specific technological trajectories, public finance can mitigate market uncertainty, potentially enabling tipping points in the financing of low-carbon projects and assets (Campiglio and Lamperti, 2021; Mazzucato and Semieniuk, 2018). However, adequate policy support, such as mission-oriented industrial policies, is essential to facilitate these tipping dynamics.
Expectation alignment on the timing and speed of the transition is an additional tipping element that can scale up sustainable investment (Campiglio and Lamperti, 2021; Campiglio et al., 2023; see Figure 4.4.6). Uncertainty about the future prospects of low-carbon assets and unclear information about the strength of climate policy can lead to conservative wait-and-see approaches among investors, especially private ones. However, certainty regarding future climate policy schedules can signal the long-term trajectory of the economy, establishing a positive correlation between macroeconomic performance and the returns of low-carbon assets. For example, the public Contracts for Difference scheme in the UK) provided policy certainty on low-carbon electricity generation and triggered large private investments, expanding the stock of offshore wind capacity and lowering power generation costs well below conventional sources. Further, the alignment of beliefs can coordinate and shift the strategies of long-term institutional investors, transforming low-carbon investment from diversification assets to strategic ones and increasing the risk of carbon-intensive assets. Clear and trustworthy climate policy is key for such an alignment to occur. This shift would reduce the cost of capital for low-carbon firms, facilitate their growth, and create a virtuous feedback loop of low-carbon investment.